Google

Friday, September 21, 2007

Factchecking

What can help stop the misconceptions that result in the lack of civic understanding that causes the test results shown in the previous posting?

As a news researcher, my policy was to never answer a question without checking the facts first. (Difficult at the times when someone yells a question across a desk and you're sure you know the answer, but necessary anyway.)

Who's replacing -- or using -- the news researchers in the public discourse these days?

There's a sudden proliferation of web sites that are doing just that, especially as this election seasons approaches. First around was, of course, FactCheck.org , which is funded by Annenberg Public Policy Center and says its goal is 'Holding Politicians Accountable'.

Says FactCheck: Maybe It's a Trend, referring to the emergence of Politfact (mentioned here earlier), from Poynter's CQ and St. Pete Times, and the new FactChecker blog from WashingtonPost.com (which I cited Wednesday).

Now FactCheck.org may have help for the education problem: FactCheckEd.org, which offers help to students and professors on how to determine truth. Check out Straight from the Source, for example, which tells how to trust web sites; and Don't be fooled: Tools of the Trade, for more guidance.

On this topic, I've received a copy of a new book, Consider the Source, by two young journalists whose website is The Reporters' Well. This looks like a very useful exercise in determining the value of news and information sites, and I'll have more to say on this once I've read it.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home